- Plustek OpticFilm i Ai Review & Rating | opylatymih.tk
- Optimum scan results for brilliant images
- OpticFilm 8200i
- Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai Film Scanner
- Plustek OpticFilm 8200 SE at a glance:
SilverFast 8 supports Photoshop Elements 8 to SilverFast 8. All rights reserved. Optimum scan results for brilliant images Professional Scanner Software for Plustek Scanners Plustek has developed a range of flatbed scanners, book scanners and film scanners. Scanner Selection Select your Plustek model to obtain scanner-specific information. Download demos and updates, check compatibility and prices. Movies Our movies will introduce all SilverFast highlights and advantages to you, quick and easy to understand.
Below you can directly select some movies showing the most important SilverFast features. Highlights Thanks to its unique features and highlights SilverFast has become world standard for scanner software.www.integrated-trading.com/assets/nashville/funny-questions-speed-dating.php
Plustek OpticFilm i Ai Review & Rating | opylatymih.tk
A majority of these features is patented and protected by trademark law. Read here what editors and customers think about SilverFast. Some of the articls are Plustek specific reviews. SilverFast vs. Plustek Drivers Every scanner manufacturer provides an own scanner software for its devices. Usually, these software solutions are not as powerful as SilverFast. Therefore, we compare for you. The rates shown here are a guide only.
Actual values may differ when applying with the lease provider. Ebuyer UK Limited act as a credit broker working with a finance lender to help you find a suitable finance product that meets your needs. We do not make a charge to you for helping you find a suitable finance lender however we may receive a commission payment from the lender for our work as a broker. If you are unsure whether delivery restrictions apply to you, please call our customer support team on 33 00 who will be happy to help.
- A case for home scanning & the Plustek OpticFilm 8200i – Guest post by KJ Vogelius.
- Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai Film Scanner;
- Professional Scanner Software for Plustek Scanners;
- top 10 web browsers for mac!
The screen flickers and an image gradually appears. The moment preserved on silver and gelatin is now displayed on my laptop. With a few preset commands contrast is increased, sharpening applied, and exposure balanced. Now a finished original — ready to be printed, backed up and shared in an instant to friends and family across the globe. The more methodical approach, excellent tools and delayed gratification have made the experience immensely rewarding.
Good looking, finished results of adequate quality without doing anything more than asking when dropping off the roll. This, as well as the cost and two week delivery time has made me look into alternatives. After looking into lab offerings both locally and abroad I was disheartened. However I soon concluded that if I scanned myself I could get my cost down to a third and cut delivery time to days instead of weeks — a compelling proposition indeed. The choice instead boils down to balancing a number of advantages against a number of disadvantages.
Optimum scan results for brilliant images
Much like with cameras or phones or cars or toasters. After looking into pretty much every option on the market as well as a bunch of discontinued ones I decided on the Plustek Opticfilm i. It scans negatives or positives at up to dpi, resulting in huge 60 megapixel files. The main disadvantage of the scanner is that each frame needs to be manually fed and scanned individually.
There are three options in the Plustek Opticfilm line. The two i models, called SE and AI, differ only in software. All versions come with Silverfast — generally referred to as the Photoshop of scanning software. The cheaper and i SE comes with a slightly pared down version of the software that lacks some features, but the differences seem mostly academic.
All versions are plenty capable but also a bit eccentric at times. I actually found it easier than expected with most settings pretty straight forward. I wanted to see how hard it would be to get a similar result and if there were any gains or losses in image quality. I figured that the best way to find out was to compare it to a known quantity.
I also tried scanning at a few different resolutions to find out what the sweet-spot is.
Below is a few crops from each scan. Click to view in full resolution. Both Plustek scans show a bit more detail than the Frontier. Below are a few more comparisons. All scanned at dpi. Editing the files I can get the Plustek ones to look like the Frontier scans, but not the other way around. Scanning a 36 exposure roll has generally taken me around two hours. While that might sound like a lot I tend to process the previous frame while the scanner is working on the next one. I also find I get a bit faster with each roll, figuring out what settings to tweak to get what outcome.
As for settings I scan everything at dpi and output as an 8-bit tiff. I generally regard the scan as a piece of raw material, for later editing in Lightroom. As such I want to maximize the data captured and saved at scanning, so I set contrast to a minimum, disable sharpening and use a generic inversion profile. I initially had a few issues with clipped highlights and shadows. I found the best workaround to be to scan tricky negatives with the software set to a colour negative image instead of a monochrome one.
I give each negative strip a few blasts with a simple bulb air blower before and after mounting them in the film holder. I definitely appreciate the appeal of having a lab scan your images, the convenience and easily attained quality. But it all hinges on what lab offerings are available. To me, the trade-offs are simply not worth it. Scanning at home has given me more control and higher quality files.
I go into more detail and continue to add my findings with the i in a running article on my site. Let me know in the comments if you have any questions. The more people chuck me a small amount of cash each month, the more time I can spend building and improving upon it - simple as that! Become a Patron! Alternatively, if you just enjoyed this post, or like the odd post here and there, please feel free to chuck a few pennies in the tip jar via Ko fi here:. Great article! I currently have been experimenting with the Epson v flatbed scanner without much luck.
Maybe I should try this one.
Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai Film Scanner
Thanks Teddy! I know some people use custom holders or spacers. Maybe worth trying before getting a new scanner? I have a v as well. I started using vuescan instead of the epson software that the scanner came with and it has made a worlds difference. I also have another plugin in photoshop called colorperfect. Pretty accurate with film types. It takes the negative image and converts it to whatever film you used. Try it out. Nice article, and totally agree about home scans.
I am curious if you thought about the Pakon scanner. I did think a lot about the Pakon. It looks like a great scanner. Speed and colour both look amazing. More than twice what the Plustek goes for new. Hi KJ, thanks for this nice writeup on the Plustek scanner. I considered it too, and I have some remarks to your post. My lab is in this price range and delivers files with a size of about 10 to 12 Megabytes jpeg files and pixel counts of 19,5 Megapixels x pixels. The Plustek files look very much OK, though they lack contrast in my opinion — easily remedied in Photoshop though.
Quality looks good — similar to your lab scans, and those last weeks I have been pondering a return to home scanning. And some reports say it has problems recognising the individual frames — does anyone have information on this scanner? Of course you are absolutely right: Home scanning and developing gives you full control over your pictures. Now if I would be able to learn really good home printing on a not too expensive printer…..
Ah yes, forgot scanning software…. It never gave me good results, is too complex, too convoluted…. I used Vuescan — once you get the hang of it it really delivers anything you want out of it.
Plustek OpticFilm 8200 SE at a glance:
Thanks Frank! But all the local alternatives have pretty similar prices for scanning. They offer cheaper prices but when factoring in shipping to and from Sweden the prices were still too high for my taste. The dpi scan is for instance over pixels wide. I personally feel that pixel dimensions easier to relate to than megabytes. A single frame takes around a minute in dpi on my computer.
Hard to say which one is better but the Plustek is definitely cheaper. Will have to think about all this a bit. After a few air blasts I rarely get more than a few spots per image. They are corrected within seconds in Lightroom. Faster than the extra pass scanning in IR. Great article, KJ, and really valuable for those of us shooting film and thinking about home scanning.
- diskwarrior 5 mac free download.
- pc to mac external hard drive transfer.
- Access Denied.
- monitors for mac pro 2013.
I have both the Plustek and an Epson Perfection model. I use the Epson regularly because you can scan 18 frames at a time. Cuts down on the manual labor. However, the cool thing about the Plustek is that is its portability. I took it with me over Christmas while visiting family, and was able to develop and scan while away from home. It only comes out again the next time I need it. Thanks for a great article. My only problem is that I shoot a lot of medium format film, and I have yet to find a cost-effective medium format scanner.
Thanks Amro! I do shoot MF occasionally too and initially I wanted to get something that could handle both formats. That quickly got ruled out due to cost though. If I was shooting MF more often I would probably get a flatbed to scan it with. Thanks a lot for the great informative post! An interesting review. But there one aspect that potential buyers of a Plustek should be aware of: the actual scan resolution claimed of dpi is not achievable.
In reality, one would be lucky to get even half of this, and in one German review, where I gleaned this info, the max dpi with this setting was only around dpi. Here is the full review:. For scanning 35mm film, dedicated film scanners are a must. The quality of these scans is absolutely amazing. This scans at a mere dpi, but defies modern thinking in producing sharp scans from colour and black and white.
And it comes with its own extensive scan software to get the best out of each scan. I understand that the Kodak Pakon is an excellent scanner, but is now prohibitively expensive. There is one on ebay. Terry, on filmscanner. It is said to achieve dpi even at the dpi setting.
Compared to for the Plustek when scanning at and producing much larger files. Frank, that Reflecta looks very interesting indeed. But I would have to consider how much more I would get from it over and above my Minolta to justify the expense.
I tend to agree. It is not easy to find any reliable information regarding the scanning dpi needed to extract the most from film, as the grain structure is probably the limiting factor and once the scanner res can reproduce the grain, nothing is to be gained by using a higher resolution scan. But at what point does this occur? I have seen comparison scans at dpi and and indeed the higher res was apparent, but not by much.
But this was using a Nikon scanner with a high quality 6 element lens.